Direct lender: Equity VS Debt
This is an interesting take on what it means to be a direct lender. To summarize, almost all financial institutions lend money that is not ‘their money,’ it is their customer’s deposits. This is why they are able to offer such attractive terms; they pay .005% APR on deposits and loan it at 5% or higher depending on the applicants credit.
It would look much different the bank’s loans were coming out of equity. It is said best in the above article: “If you look at your own expected return on capital for the money you hold, are you prepared to give it to someone else for a three or four percent return that may be secured, but hardly guaranteed? The answer in most cases is absolutely not.”
This is unique way to explain what business owners already know; Equity is not cheap. So in an effort to keep capital cheap banks use other people’s money. The author of the above article argues that this makes banks an intermediary of the real source of capital and therefore not a direct lender.
This is an interesting take. Traditionally, entities are not a “direct lender” if they are simply brokers which package deals to be sent to the actual source of capital (in return for a commission). That source of capital is a bank, which is distinguished from a broker because they hold funds intended for lending.
Regardless of what degree an organization is an intermediary of capital, the only entities that can be considered true direct lenders are private mortgage lenders or other asset based lenders. This is why their cost of borrowing is much higher than that of banks; they are lending either entirely or predominately out of equity.
This fits into a point made in another post by the same author, where he stated asset based lending is essentially renting equity. This is most accurate in regards to a factoring and PO financing. Companies that offer these financial tools make money through fees that come directly out of earned profits. [This is in contrast to traditional loans that add to overhead.] This means that the financer essentially has an equity position on the deals they finance.
This is a solid solution for more short or mid term financing situations when cheaper, bank financing is not available. “Renting” equity is much less expensive long term than giving up a piece of the action forever.
